Skip to main content

RLS 3-2-1

First Order Knowledge Claims:


  • "The US Library of Congress accepted a 'translation' into emoji of Herman Melville's Moby Dick."
  • "He and his team created 176 characters, 12 pixels square."
  • "It wasn't until 2006 that the three networks came to some kind of consensus."


Second Order Knowledge Claims:


  • The fact that emojis are about embellishment and added context is based on the seemingly obvious claim that emojis are capable of conveying ideas, information, and feelings. 
  • The fact that emojis are unmistakably Japanese is based on the claim that there are all manners of emojis that represent Japanese culture or lifestyle. An example of this is that there is no Easter Egg, but a Kadomatsu (A Japanese Pine decoration associated with New Year) is present among the options. 

Knowledge Question: 

To what extent can people communicate ideas through chat trends and emoji?




Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Cannon-Bard Theory

The Cannon-Bard Theory, one of the theories that have a fewer believer base, was created in the early 1920s. Since then, other theories such as the Two-Factor theory and the James-Lange Theory have been created and are more widely acclaimed. The Cannon-Bard Theory states that after a stimulus (external occurrence) takes place, humans react to the prompt and experience the emotion affiliated with it at the SAME TIME. For instance, when a bear roars at you (the stimulus), rather than simply feeling instant fear, the Cannon-Bard Theory states that both the feeling of fear (the emotion) and the symptoms of fear: a pounding heart, sweating, e.t.c (the reaction) both occur at the same time. This is an outdated theory for its limitations are significant. For instance, it is mostly seen that the reaction occurs before the actual emotion. However, this common idea (could be regarded as a second-order knowledge claim) is directly opposed by the Cannon-Bard Theory. It however manages t...
4 comments
Read more

RLS: Eyewitness Accounts

First Order Knowledge Claims:  “Kevin Brinkley’s murder conviction as a juvenile was nearly 40 years ago.” “The conviction was based largely on the testimony of two eyewitnesses.”  “The fact that Brinkley’s conviction was based on what appears to be faulty eyewitness testimony is sadly, all too common.” “Eyewitness misidentification is the single biggest contributor to wrongful convictions.” “More than 70 percent of the convictions that have been overturned through DNA testing nationwide involved eyewitnesses who got it wrong, according to the Innocence Project.”  Second Order Knowledge Claims:  The fact that Brinkley’s murder conviction as a juvenile was nearly 40 years ago can be trusted because quantifiable data is thought to be accurate. The fact that 70% of the overturned convictions through DNA testing involved faulty eyewitnesses can be trusted to be accurate because people have different DNA, which results in each person ha...
Post a Comment
Read more